简介：

　　法国高校文学老师吉尔曼（法布莱斯·鲁奇尼 Fabrice Luchini 饰）给学生布置了一篇周记，要求他们如实记录周末的见闻。在众多乏味的作业中吉尔曼意外发现16岁少年克劳德（恩斯特·吴默埃 Ernst Umhauer 饰）的文章异常精彩。克劳德是一个安静的观察者，习 惯坐在教室的最后一排。他的作业是关于偷窥——讲述他如何潜入朋友家中、窥探对方一家生活的故事。吉尔曼被字里行间深深吸引，熄灭已久的文学激情亦被点燃。他不但决定单独辅导才华横溢的克劳德、鼓励他放手创作，还与妻子珍娜（克里斯汀·斯科特·托马斯 Kristin Scott Thomas 饰）一同分享克劳德的作文。然而成年人在阅读过程中竟渐渐忘记了虚构和现实的边界，更懵然不知自己的居室早已房门大开......
　　法国鬼才导演弗朗索瓦·欧容曾凭借黑暗惊心的《八美图》、《泳池谋杀案》惊艳世界影坛。在《5×2》、《时光驻留》等温情文艺片后，新片《登堂入室》再次回归欧容最擅长的悬疑惊悚题材。电影改编自西班牙舞台剧《最后一排的男孩》，导演巧妙拼接偷窥文学与扑朔迷离的现实断面，用似真似幻、充满层次感的创作故事挑战情欲道德禁区。本片入围法国凯撒奖六项大奖，获多伦多电影节国际影评人费比西奖和西班牙圣塞巴斯蒂安电影节最佳影片金贝壳奖，同时入选欧洲年度最佳电影之一。

简介：

在逃罪犯布鲁诺(Bruno)被吸食吗啡上瘾的艾格尼丝(Agnes)窝藏起来.艾格尼丝的丈夫帕斯卡(Pascal)作为一名警察正通过逮捕布鲁诺来恢复自己的名誉. 当帕斯卡遇见并爱上了妻子的同事,身为学校教师的塞西尔(Cecile)时,他和艾格尼丝本已紧张的关系变得更僵.面对帕斯卡把视线都集中在了布鲁诺和塞西尔身上这一情况,艾格尼丝不得不作出了自己的决定.

简介：

　　

简介：

　　刚从瑟堡来的斯蒂芬，加入了巴黎93省圣德尼的“反犯罪特种部队”。在这里，他遇到了新队友克里斯和瓦达，两位经验丰富的警察。但他很快就感受到了这个街区不同帮派间剑拔弩张的紧张氛围。在一次出警的行动中，局面变得不可控制，而这个事件意外地被一架无人机记录下来，进而引发了更为剧烈的冲突。

简介：

　　文森特（马提亚斯·修奈尔饰）从战场返回家乡，被一个富有的商人雇做私人保镖，负责在他出差的时候保护他的妻子和孩子。文森特很快发现，表面平静的马里兰却也隐藏着危险。

简介：

　　Victoria, 8 year old girl whose mother just passed away, relocates with her father in a small mountain village. She finds solace in the adoption of a puppy of unknown origin found in an isolated farm.

简介：

　　1986年4月26日，位于切尔诺贝利核电站几公里处的普里皮亚季小镇。
　　在这个明媚的春天里，安雅和彼得正在举行婚礼，小瓦列里与他当核电站工程师的父亲阿列克谢种下了一颗苹果树，森林看管员尼古拉照例在森林中巡视...就在此时，一场事故在核电站发生了。彼得被征召去扑灭大火，就再也没有回来。
　　受到这场灾难的影响，放射性物质将大自然顷刻变了样。当地居民突然被疏散。被当局要求封口的阿列克谢，宁愿消失...
　　10年后。
　　被居民们废弃的鬼城普里皮亚季，成了无人之地，这座现代的庞贝被建成了一个奇特的旅游之地...
　　今天的安雅成了这里的导游，而瓦列里在这里寻找他的父亲，尼古拉则继续耕作着他那有毒的花园。
　　时间成就了它的作品，一个新生活的希望是否可能？

简介：

　　男友因车祸意外去世，汤姆（泽维尔·多兰 Xavier Dolan 饰）驱车前往男友家人所在的偏远农场参加葬礼，才得知原来男友母亲并不知道儿子的性取向。男友哥哥弗朗西斯（皮埃尔 - 伊夫·卡迪纳尔 Pierre-Yves Cardinal 饰）恐同而暴力，他威胁汤姆不得透露与弟弟的真实关系，并野蛮的将汤姆囚禁在农场。始料未及的是汤姆渐渐喜欢上农场生活，而弗朗西斯和母亲在与汤姆的接触中也陷入一场心理游戏…
　　《汤姆的农场旅行》讲述一位年轻同志参加男友葬礼，发现自己与男友的关系是秘密，然后更进一步发现恋人的母亲与哥哥也有自己的秘密；由于他的意外出席，引发哥哥不惜使用暴力也要隐藏的动机。这是一部心理惊悚片，全片以层层剥丝的方式来挖掘当事人隐晦的相互关系，风格冷僻，过程令人不寒而栗。电影由年轻加拿大导演多兰自编、自导、自演、自剪，并自做服装设计，再现了他的多兰美学与“不可能之爱”。《汤姆的农场旅行》入围第70届威尼斯电影节主竞赛单元，获得国际影评人费比西奖(FIPRESCI)。

简介：Suzy,暂无内容a暂无内容beautiful暂无内容woman,暂无内容is暂无内容coming暂无内容back暂无内容to暂无内容Paris暂无内容to暂无内容attend暂无内容the暂无内容funeral暂无内容of暂无内容her暂无内容lover,暂无内容a暂无内容married暂无内容man.暂无内容Cecile,暂无内容his暂无内容wife,暂无内容is暂无内容holding暂无内容Suzy暂无内容responsible暂无内容for暂无内容his暂无内容suicide.暂无内容By暂无内容finding暂无内容Suzy暂无内容in暂无内容Paris,暂无内容Cecile暂无内容is暂无内容trying暂无内容to暂无内容seek暂无内容the暂无内容truth暂无内容by暂无内容playing暂无内容a暂无内容psychological暂无内容game暂无内容on暂无内容her.

简介：

　　阿兰·吉罗迪今年的作品《保持站立》于戛纳争夺金棕榈还未结束，他的下一部作品《隐伏的付出》(Pays Perdu，暂译)已提上日程。影片讲述一名环保业内人士欲关闭法国南部某村落的一家牛奶厂，当他在接触工厂里的人，并爱上这里的一个人后，他打算放弃原先的计划。目前该片尚无其他消息。

简介：

　　Au milieu de l'été, Sasha, 30 ans, décède soudainement. Alors qu'ils se connaissent peu, son compagnon Lawrence et sa sœur Zoé se rapprochent. Ils partagent comme ils peuvent la peine et le poids de l'absence, entre Berlin, Paris et New York. Trois étés, trois villes, le temps de leur retour à la lumière, portés par le souvenir de celle qu'ils ont aimée.

简介：

莫扎特（米开朗琪罗·勒孔特 Mikelangelo Loconte 饰）自幼便展现出了过人的音乐天赋，长大后，他和同为音乐家的父亲一起为教皇工作。新上任的统治者是一个毫无情趣，性格异常古板的男人，这让向来自由不羁的莫扎特感到难以忍受。20岁那一年，莫扎特和母亲一起离开了故乡萨尔斯堡，前往欧洲另谋生路。　　然而，莫扎特的出格和放纵让所有人都不愿意雇佣他，向他投怀送抱的阿洛伊西亚（梅丽莎·玛斯 Melissa Mars 饰）也不过是想接着他的名气向上攀爬而已。在巴黎，莫扎特的母亲去世了，事业爱情双双失败的音乐家垂头丧气的回到了家乡。但他并没有气馁，而是坚持着自己的梦想，等待着出人头地的机会。

简介：

　　阿迈德是一个生活在比利时的移民少年。像许多摸索个人价值的青春期孩子一样，阿迈德对父母和学校定下的规则有疑问。曾经是心中偶像的表哥叛逆地离开了比利时。青春期敏感孤独的少年之心需要叛逆的做派来武装。他于是也模仿起表哥，并和社区补习班年轻的数学女老师发生了冲突……

简介：

　　午夜，香港维港一艘私人游艇，亿万富翁奈里欧·温奇（米基·马诺洛维克 Miki Manojlović饰）离奇淹死。作为势力庞大的W集团的创始人和大股东的奈里欧并没有正式的继承人，他将把所有的财富赠给他的秘密养子拉戈·温奇（托莫·希思黎 Tomer Sisley饰）。二十年前奈里欧在南斯拉夫的孤儿院收养了男孩拉戈。然而继承这大笔遗产的拉戈，却遭遇了一连串错从复杂的暗杀与陷害，一场扑朔迷离的生死决斗就此上演。
　　由法国导演吉勒莫·塞勒执导的影片《决战豪门》，改编自比利时漫画家菲利普·弗朗柯的同名漫画。影片横跨法国、美国、香港、东欧各国拍摄，加之不断穿梭在回忆与现实中险象环生的故事情节，荣获2012年第38届美国电影电视土星奖最佳国际电影提名。

简介：

　　一次出诊中，包法利医生（让-弗朗索瓦·巴尔梅 Jean-François Balmer）和年轻的女孩艾玛（伊莎贝尔·于佩尔 Isabelle Huppert 饰）相遇了，艾玛的纯情和美丽让医生迅速坠入了情网，两人随即结婚。婚后的生活并不如艾玛所幻想的那样充满了乐趣和激情，是帅气的雷翁（卢卡斯·贝尔沃克斯 Lucas Belvaux 饰）的出现让艾玛重新快乐了起来，但他的离开带来的则是更深的痛苦和绝望。富豪鲁道夫（克里斯托弗·马拉沃伊 Christophe Malavoy 饰）贪恋艾玛的美色，给予了她诸多的空洞承诺，而为了配得上鲁道夫，艾玛不惜赊账购入首饰与华服。在约定好私奔的那一天，鲁道夫失约了，大受打击的艾玛一病不起。
　　在丈夫的照料下，艾玛渐渐康复，在一场音乐会上，她与雷翁重逢了，与后者打的火热的日子里，艾玛丝毫没有察觉自己早已债台高筑。而当催债的传票出现在眼前时，被所有男人抛弃的艾玛选择了死亡。

简介：

　　二十世纪法国女作家薇奥丽，经过人生情感挫败以及与同性恋丈夫的短暂婚姻后，展开了写作生涯，并在巴黎遇见生命贵人西蒙波娃。当她捧着以半生爱欲写成的小说到波娃面前时，波娃被她的才华与自我挖掘的能量所吸引，决定帮她付梓出版。然而，薇奥丽也从这天起，无法抑止自己对西蒙波娃的迷恋，渴求更多的关注，无奈只能以文字升华一切。

简介：

　　25岁的玛歌正试图完成硕士学位，并准备结束一段工作与爱情。在某次派对上，她遇见45岁在学校教史地的玛歌，她们不只撞名，人生经历竟然也都一模一样。当年轻的自己与中年的自己相遇，相同灵魂却不同年纪的两人，将会如何为各自走出更好的未来？

简介：

　　路易斯（让-保罗·贝尔蒙多 Jean Paul Belmondo 饰）是一名十分富有的烟厂老板，他从海外购入了一位“邮寄新娘”，哪知道出现在自己面前的女子朱丽（凯瑟琳·德纳芙 Catherine Deneuve 饰）竟然是如此的美艳不可方物，觉得自己赚到了的路易斯很快就陷入了朱丽一手编制的情网之中无法自拔。
　　随着时间的推移，路易斯渐渐发现，朱丽的背后，隐藏着一个又一个难解的谜题，他甚至都无法确定，眼前的这个女人，是否真的就是自己当初决定购买的那个女人。终于，朱丽暴露出了真实面目，卷走了路易斯的财产不知所踪，可是此时的路易斯早已经被朱丽迷住了心窍，他决定无论对方是如何的蛇蝎心肠，也要追随她到天涯海角。

简介：

　　不是巧合，相依為命的父女、愛酒的父親、起眼的道具，都衝着小津而來。Claire Denis（《影舞者瑪德》）獻給小津之作，如果不說，你只能認得出運鏡如寫詩的簽名樣式，也不會知道兩人可以這麼近。憂鬱的藍夜，迷宮似的公路網，交織樓房之間的地鐵路軌，高超的場面調度先寫孤寂的城市個性，然後人物放進去，不用多話，戲便自然在了。不放心女兒的父親，不想去愛的女兒，宛如親人的鄰里，凝聚成親和力極強的世界，展開連綿故事。小津會認同：生命有時，人要懂得放下。

简介：

　　Voice 1 (male "professional announcer" type): This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.
　　These people also scorned "subjective profundity". They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.
　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone): Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.
　　Voice 1: They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.
　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.
　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.
　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.
　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole "” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.
　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.
　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...
　　Voice 2: "Our life is a journey "” In the winter and the night. "” We seek our passage..."�
　　Voice 1: The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.
　　Voice 2: There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.
　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.
　　Voice 3 (young girl): No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.
　　Voice 1: The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.
　　Voice 2: One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.
　　Voice 1: When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment "ordinary life"� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.
　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant: nuns.
　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.
　　Voice 2: The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.
　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.
　　Voice 3: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.
　　Voice 1: In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.
　　Voice 2: Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.
　　Voice 1: What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.
　　Voice 2: The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept?
　　Voice 3: What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.
　　Voice 2: Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.
　　Voice 1: Really hard to drink more.
　　Voice 2: Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation "” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.
　　Voice 3: There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments? The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.
　　Voice 2: In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.
　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.
　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point?
　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.
　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

简介：

　　七岁的诺拉面临首度上学的恐惧，看似在学校适应良好的哥哥亚伯，一方面要安抚妹妹，一方面有自己的难题。上课钟声响起，在陌生的环境中除了得向同学自我介绍，诺拉还有下水游泳、走平衡木的新挑战；终于熬到下课时间，却意外发现哥哥的小秘密，想告诉父亲却被下了封口令。宛如小型社会的学校生活，课堂上的表现、同辈间的压力考验着兄妹俩的感情，诺拉能否在校园中拥有自己的归属呢？
　　比利时新锐导演萝拉汪戴尔首部长片，以手持长镜头、锁定与孩童等高的影像画面，紧紧跟随初次上学的诺拉，校园环境音、孩童嬉闹声层层推叠，成功将主角的惴惴不安，透过银幕蔓延开来。饰演兄妹的两位小演员表演浑然天成、细腻精彩，随著剧情的推进，光是一道眼神的变化就足以令人心碎。

简介：

　　一名面临问题的警察被逼得离开精英小队后，发现前同事纷纷在神秘谋杀案中丧生，于是擅自展开调查，誓要揪出谋杀前队友的罪魁祸首。

简介：

　　故事发生在1900年左右的法国。时髦少女塞莱丝汀从动荡不安的巴黎来到诺曼底当家庭女仆。在兰莱尔一家人的别墅里，她面对的是好色的男主人和他那性冷淡、专横和嫉妒心强的妻子。塞莱丝汀决心避免遭遇厨师玛丽安的悲惨命运——自己结婚生下的孩子死去了，但绝望发现自己又怀上了。这个年轻 的女仆对神秘的男仆约瑟夫的行径感到好奇：他四处分发反犹太传单，并暗示她可以在瑟堡为他从事妓女工作。
　　继让•雷诺阿（1946）和路易斯•布鲁诺尔（1964）之后，伯努瓦•雅克再次选择奥克塔夫•米尔博的小说来对资产阶级进行冷嘲热讽。影片以一个竭力保全自己生活的年轻女人为主角，通过其日记的视角，雅克展现了看似无力的力量和似乎有力的无力性。女仆的形象揭开了20世纪早期隐藏的黑暗腹地，也暗示了当今生活的不安定性。

简介：　　本片是超现实主义电影之父路易斯·布努埃尔和超现实主义画家萨尔瓦多·达利的跨界合作。表现的是人的梦境和潜意识。故事分两段，第一段开头，一个忧郁的男青年（路易斯·布努埃尔 Luis Bunuel 饰）坐在月光下，磨着剃刀，他抽着烟，等着年轻女孩出现。男青年拿着剃刀抚弄年 轻女孩的脸，用剃刀割开了她的眼球，同时乌云划过了月亮。第二段的时间设定在8年之后，马路上出现了一个骑着自行车穿着类似女装斗篷的男青年，他晕倒在一个女人的楼下，女人下楼来拿走了他手中的盒子，男人再也没有醒来。回到屋内后女人坐着沉思，另一个男人来敲门，手心布满了蚂蚁，当男人和女人在研究蚂蚁的时候，楼下一个穿着男装的女人正在拨弄一支断手，引起了路人的围观。随后女人的乳房、南瓜、修道士、钢琴、衣衫褴褛的男女纷纷出现在画面中，富有象征意义的梦境被一一展现。